Skip to main content

Docker vs. Podman: Which Container Runtime Should You Use?

·361 words·2 mins· loading · loading ·
Ronny Roethof
Author
Ronny Roethof
A security-minded sysadmin who fights corporate BS with open source weapons and sarcasm
Table of Contents

Containers are the backbone of modern, portable applications. But which runtime should you pick? Docker has long been the standard, but Podman is a strong, secure alternative. Here’s a quick comparison to help you decide.

Docker: The Industry Standard
#

Docker is mature, widely supported, and feature-rich.

Architecture: Client-Server

  • docker CLI → talks to dockerd (root daemon)
  • Runs containers, manages images, networks, volumes

Getting started:

# Install Docker Engine & Docker Compose
docker-compose up

Pros:

  • Massive Ecosystem: The de facto industry standard with endless tutorials.
  • Docker Compose: Mature and powerful for defining multi-container apps.

Cons:

  • Security: The root daemon is a potential security risk. Access to the Docker socket means root access to the host.

Podman: The Secure, Daemonless Alternative
#

Podman is a daemonless container engine focused on security and tight OS integration.

Architecture: Fork-Exec

  • The podman command directly creates and manages containers as child processes.
  • No central daemon. Runs rootless by default, a major security win.

Getting Started:

# Often pre-installed on Fedora/CentOS/RHEL
sudo apt-get install podman
# Use podman-compose or native Pods
podman-compose up -d

Pros:

  • Enhanced Security: Rootless by default significantly reduces the attack surface.
  • Systemd Integration: Easily run containers as system services.
  • Pods: Native support for multi-container apps, similar to Kubernetes.

Cons:

  • Compose Compatibility: podman-compose is a separate project and can sometimes lag behind the latest Docker Compose features.

Head-to-Head: Docker vs. Podman
#

FeatureDockerPodman
ArchitectureClient-Server (Root Daemon)Fork-Exec (Daemonless)
SecurityDaemon runs as rootRootless by default
Multi-Containerdocker-composepodman-compose or Pods
EcosystemThe established standardGrowing, especially in RHEL/Fedora
Commandsdocker ...podman ... (mostly identical, alias docker=podman works)

Conclusion: Which One Should You Use?
#

Choose Docker if:

  • You’re a beginner and want the largest pool of tutorials.
  • Your workflow depends heavily on the latest docker-compose features.
  • You work in an environment standardized on Docker.

Choose Podman if:

  • Security is your top priority (especially on multi-user servers).
  • You want to manage containers as systemd services.
  • You prefer a leaner, daemonless architecture.

For my homelab, I’m leaning more towards Podman for its security model and systemd integration. However, Docker remains a fantastic and reliable choice, especially when docker-compose simplicity is key.

Related

Building a Proper CI/CD Pipeline for Ansible Roles (Because Manual Testing is for Suckers)
·867 words·5 mins· loading · loading
My Personal Take: Company Laptops - Security Ain't Everything (But It's Still My Job, Damn IT)
·1207 words·6 mins· loading · loading
Error: externally-managed-environment when installing via pip3
·325 words·2 mins· loading · loading